Two days ago, Anthropic released Claude 3.7 Sonnet, their most intelligent model to date and the market’s first hybrid reasoning model. Our Chief Data Scientist and team have been working around the clock to test this breakthrough technology, and the results are remarkable..
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Game-Changing AI for Legal Discovery Read More »
Our exploration of generative AI in trial preparation has demonstrated how Large Language Models can analyze complex materials to generate sophisticated closing arguments. We began by showing how to overcome traditional LLM length limitations, then demonstrated these techniques by creating closing arguments for both TransOcean and Halliburton in the BP Deepwater Horizon trial. Now we take on perhaps the most challenging perspective: the government’s case against all three defendants.
Creating a Compelling Argument in the BP Trial: Government Plaintiffs’ Closing Read More »
When NSW’s Chief Justice issued sweeping restrictions on GenAI use in courts last November, many viewed it as the world’s most restrictive legal AI policy. Just two months later, the court pivoted dramatically – offering valuable lessons for courts worldwide navigating this complex terrain.
Join our exceptional panel of judges and legal experts on March 6th at 2:00 PM ET.
This article continues our exploration by examining Halliburton’s perspective in the BP Deepwater Horizon Phase One liability trial. As another key defendant in this landmark case, Halliburton’s position offers a distinct viewpoint that demonstrates the versatility of GenAI in crafting nuanced legal arguments from different angles.
Creating a Compelling Argument in the BP Trial: Halliburton’s Closing Read More »
As legal organizations race to embrace artificial intelligence, there is an important discussion that needs to take place about the two core deployment options: private Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. The issues are focused on implementation and maintenance, security, customization, and costs–vital factors that can either make AI deployment an immediate success or a prolonged challenge. Let’s get to the heart of the matter while outlining what each of these models actually do.
RAG vs. Private LLMs: Making the Right Choice for Your Legal Organization Read More »
For legal professionals evaluating artificial intelligence tools, DeepSeek’s breakthrough represents more than just another technology milestone. It signals a fundamental shift in how AI systems can be developed, deployed, and accessed. Understanding how DeepSeek achieved this breakthrough, and what it means for the legal industry, requires examining both its technical innovations and its potential limitations.
The recent announcement of the Illinois Supreme Court’s AI policy, effective January 2025, marks a watershed moment in judicial approaches to AI regulation. While some jurisdictions like New South Wales are implementing strict controls that may hamper innovation, Illinois has chosen a dramatically different path – one that could serve as a blueprint for courts grappling with these transformative technologies.
We’re launching a series examining how GenAI can transform trial preparation by analyzing complex litigation materials and generating persuasive closing arguments. Using the landmark BP Deepwater Horizon Phase One liability trial as our case study, we’ll demonstrate how AI can process vast amounts of testimony and trial exhibits to construct compelling arguments for each party involved.
Using Generative AI to Create Compelling Closing Arguments in Complex Litigation Read More »
“Why Can’t My LLM Write My Closing Argument,” you might ask? And what can I do to fix that? We wrote this article to help legal professionals understand the answer to that question. We also wanted to tell you how you can get any LLM to write much longer pieces. In fact, one author had Claude prepare a 17-page, single-spaced closing argument for a team of lawyers we were helping, and did it in about an hour one Sunday.
Understanding GenAI Response Limits: What Every Legal Professional Should Know Read More »
For those still skeptical about GenAI’s impact on litigation, these numbers tell a compelling story: 18,294 pages, 102 transcripts, 131 minutes. This isn’t theoretical — it’s a real-world demonstration of how technology is revolutionizing legal practice, one deposition at a time.
102 Transcript Summaries in 131 Minutes Read More »